Tag: Environment Agency

Posted on

What UK Waste Laws Apply to Small Businesses?

If you run a small business in the UK, you might assume that waste regulations are something only large industrial operators need to worry about. That assumption is both common and costly. Recent enforcement data suggests that 90% of organisations currently breaking waste law are SMEs with 0 to 50 employees. Whether you are a sole trader, a home-based business, or a limited company with a handful of staff, the legal duty of care for waste applies to you from the moment your business produces its first bag of rubbish.

This article breaks down the core UK waste laws that apply to small businesses, explains what has changed recently, and outlines the practical steps you need to take to stay compliant.

The Foundation: Duty of Care Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990

The cornerstone of UK waste law is Section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which imposes a legal “duty of care” on anyone who produces, imports, keeps, stores, transports, treats, or disposes of controlled waste. This duty is not limited to large corporations. It extends explicitly to landlords, home-based businesses, sole traders, and small and medium-sized enterprises.

In practical terms, the duty of care requires you to take all reasonable steps to ensure your waste is stored safely and securely and is only transferred to an authorised person or business. You must not dump trade waste at household recycling centres or in domestic bins. You must use a licensed waste carrier, and you must complete and retain a Waste Transfer Note (WTN) for every transfer of non-hazardous waste. These records must be kept for a minimum of two years and can be inspected by council or Environment Agency officers at any time.

Failure to comply is not a minor administrative matter. Councils across the UK are actively issuing Fixed Penalty Notices and Section 34 enforcement notices. In one recent four-month campaign in Northamptonshire, 55 formal warning notices and 16 Fixed Penalty Notices were issued for offences including duty of care breaches.

Simpler Recycling: New Separation Requirements

From 31 March 2025, new rules under the Separation of Waste (England) Regulations 2025 require businesses in England to separate recyclable materials into distinct waste streams. The core materials that must be segregated are paper and card, metal, plastic, and glass. Food waste must also be collected separately.

There is some flexibility built into the system. Metal, glass, and plastic may be collected together in a combined stream if your waste contractor offers that option, and food waste can be collected alongside garden waste.

Crucially, micro-firms with fewer than 10 full-time equivalent employees are temporarily exempt from these separation requirements until 31 March 2027. If your business has 10 or more employees, however, you should already be compliant. The Environment Agency has also introduced a cost-recovery charging scheme of £118 per hour for regulatory work connected to non-compliance, meaning that an inspection finding you in breach could result in a direct bill for the time the regulator spends investigating you.

Hazardous Waste: Stricter Rules, Even for Tiny Quantities

If your business produces any hazardous waste, the regulatory burden increases significantly. Hazardous waste includes items such as waste chemicals, fluorescent light tubes, used solvents, asbestos, waste oils, batteries, and certain electrical equipment.

Even a couple of batteries or a single tube of adhesive falls within the scope of strict legal requirements. You must keep hazardous waste separate from non-hazardous waste and must not mix different types of hazardous waste together. You must complete a hazardous waste consignment note when the waste is removed from your premises, and you must keep consignment notes for three years.

If your business produces, holds, or removes 500kg or more of hazardous waste in any 12-month period, you must register your premises with the Environment Agency (or the relevant devolved regulator). Some premises are exempt if they produce less than 200kg in a year. Fines for producing or holding hazardous waste from unregistered premises can reach £5,000.

Packaging Waste: The Extended Producer Responsibility Regime

The Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024—commonly referred to as pEPR—came into force on 1 January 2026 and have significantly widened the scope of packaging waste obligations.

Under the previous regime, only businesses with a turnover above £2 million that handled more than 50 tonnes of packaging were caught. Under pEPR, the threshold has dropped. Small businesses with an annual turnover of over £1 million that imported or supplied over 25 tonnes of packaging in the last calendar year are now classified as “small producers” and must register with the relevant regulator and submit annual data on their packaging volumes.

Businesses with a turnover below £1 million and packaging tonnage below 25 tonnes are exempt from data collection and reporting obligations. Those with a turnover between £1 million and £2 million and packaging tonnage between 25 and 50 tonnes must register and report, but they are currently exempt from paying waste disposal fees and buying Packaging Recovery Notes (PRNs).

If your business sells packaged goods online, distributes empty packaging, or imports packaged products, you should check whether you meet the “producer” definition under pEPR.

Digital Waste Tracking: What Is Changing

The UK is moving away from paper-based duty of care records towards a mandatory Digital Waste Tracking (DWT) service. The mandatory roll out was originally scheduled for April 2027 but has been delayed by six months to October 2027 to give operators, particularly SMEs, more time to prepare.

Phase One of the service, which applies to waste received at permitted facilities, began in October 2026. Phase Two will extend the system to waste carriers, brokers, and dealers who arrange or transport waste movements. In the interim, you must continue to maintain robust paper or digital duty of care records. These remain legally required until DWT becomes mandatory.

Waste laws apply to small businesses

Waste laws apply to small businesses as well as large companies.

Devolved Differences: Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland

Waste policy is devolved, which means the rules vary depending on where your business operates.

Scotland: The Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2012 require all businesses to separate glass, metal, plastics, paper, and cardboard for recycling. Food businesses producing more than 5kg of food waste per week must present it for separate collection, and disposing of food waste into the sewer via a macerator is illegal in most areas.

Wales: Since 6 April 2024, all workplaces in Wales have been required to separate paper and card, glass, metal, plastic, cartons, food waste (where 5kg or more is produced per week), small waste electrical and electronic equipment (sWEEE), and unsold textiles for collection. The Welsh regulations apply regardless of business size, with no micro-firm exemption.

Northern Ireland: Businesses in Northern Ireland are subject to the duty of care under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and must use registered waste carriers. Digital Waste Tracking will also apply across Northern Ireland as part of the UK-wide roll out.

Practical Steps for Compliance

If you run a small business, the following checklist will help you stay on the right side of the law:

1. Confirm you have a licensed waste carrier. Ask to see their waste carrier registration number and verify it with the Environment Agency or SEPA.

2. Retain Waste Transfer Notes. Keep them for at least two years for non-hazardous waste and three years for hazardous waste consignment notes.

3. Separate your recyclables. If you have 10 or more employees, you must already be segregating paper, card, metal, plastic, glass, and food waste.

4. Check your packaging obligations. If your turnover exceeds £1 million and you handle more than 25 tonnes of packaging annually, register as a small producer under pEPR.

5. Store waste securely. Prevent waste from escaping, causing litter, or attracting pests.

6. Never use household waste services for business waste. This is a common breach that councils are actively enforcing.

7. Compile a register of legal obligations for your business so you know what you have to do.

How a Consultancy Can Help

Waste compliance is not static. The regulatory landscape is shifting rapidly, with Simpler Recycling, pEPR, and Digital Waste Tracking all phasing in over the coming years. For small businesses without a dedicated compliance team, keeping track of these changes can feel overwhelming.

A specialist consultancy can help you audit your current waste arrangements, identify gaps in your duty of care documentation, advise on separation requirements, and prepare your business for the transition to digital tracking. The cost of getting it wrong—whether through Fixed Penalty Notices, Environment Agency cost-recovery charges, or reputational damage—far outweighs the cost of getting it right.

Posted on

Do Small Businesses Need an Environmental Legal Register?

A clear look at environmental obligations, business size, and why proportionate compliance matters.

It is a question we hear often from small business owners: “Do I really need an environmental legal register? Surely that’s something only for large industrial companies with dedicated environmental teams.” It’s an understandable assumption, but it is not correct. Environmental legal obligations are not switched on by company size — they are triggered by what a business actually does, what it produces, discharges, or stores, and where it operates. A small print shop and a large logistics depot may face entirely different environmental duties, regardless of which one employs more people.

In this article, we look at why the size of a business is the wrong starting point for thinking about environmental compliance, and why a well-designed environmental legal register — far from being a burden reserved for large organisations — can be one of the most practical and cost-effective tools a small business ever puts in place.

What Is an Environmental Legal Register?

An environmental legal register is a structured record of the environmental legislation, regulations, permits, and approved codes of practice that apply to a specific organisation. Rather than listing every environmental law in existence, it identifies the ones that are actually relevant to that business’s operations, sites, and activities, and sets out what needs to be done to remain compliant with each one.

Done properly, an environmental legal register becomes a single point of reference that tells a business owner or manager, at a glance: which environmental laws apply to us, what each one requires, how we currently meet that requirement, and where any gaps exist.

Environmental Obligations Depend on Circumstances, Not Company Size

This is the point worth dwelling on, because it is the one most often misunderstood. UK environmental legislation is largely activity-based and impact-based rather than headcount-based. Duties under legislation such as the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations, and waste, water, and packaging regulations apply to any business whose activities create the relevant impact — regardless of size. The specific duties that follow are shaped by factors such as:

  • The nature of the business’s processes (for example, use of chemicals, fuel storage, vehicle fleets, or manufacturing by-products)
  • The waste the business produces and how it’s stored, transported, and disposed of
  • Whether emissions to air, land, or water are involved, even at a small scale
  • Sector-specific rules that apply regardless of business size, such as packaging producer responsibility, WEEE, or discharge consents

A single-van courier business has duties around fuel storage and vehicle emissions. A small print shop has duties under waste and hazardous substances regulations for inks and solvents. A two-person mobile car valeting business has duties around wastewater discharge. None of these obligations disappear because the business is small — in some cases, a smaller business with fewer resources to manage environmental risk may need to pay closer attention, not less.

In other words, the question is never really “is my business big enough for this to matter?” The question is “what do we actually do, and what does environmental law say about doing it responsibly?” An environmental legal register is simply the tool that answers that question clearly and keeps the answer up to date as legislation changes.

environmental legal register for small business.

An environmental legal register for small business should be proportionate.

Why Small Businesses Benefit from a Concise, Proportionate Register

Recognising that environmental duties apply regardless of size is only half the picture. The other half is that how a small business meets those duties can, and should, look very different from how a large organisation meets them. A 200-page environmental legal register modelled on a multinational’s compliance framework is not only unnecessary for a small business — it’s actively counterproductive. It gets opened once, filed away, and forgotten.

A register that is built specifically for a small business, scaled to its real activities and environmental impacts, tends to work far better in practice. This is why:

1. It Stays Usable

A concise register lists only the environmental legislation that genuinely applies to that business’s operations. Instead of an overwhelming, generic checklist, the owner or manager is left with a short, relevant list they can actually refer to — and act on — day to day.

2. It Reflects the Business as It Really Operates

A bespoke register is built around the specific sites, processes, substances, and waste streams involved, rather than a one-size-fits-all industry template. This means it captures the obligations that matter and doesn’t waste time on ones that don’t.

3. It Makes Gaps Visible

Because it is proportionate rather than padded out, a well-built register makes it far easier to spot where compliance is solid and where attention is needed — an expired waste carrier’s licence, a missing duty of care record, a permit due for renewal — without those gaps being buried in irrelevant detail.

4. It Demonstrates Due Diligence

In the event of an environmental incident, a regulator visit, or a client, landlord, or insurer asking about environmental compliance arrangements, a maintained legal register is tangible evidence that the business has identified its obligations and is actively managing them. For a small business without a dedicated environmental function, this matters a great deal.

5. It Supports Growth Without Starting from Scratch

As a small business takes on new processes, new premises, or new materials, an environmental legal register built with the right structure can be updated and expanded rather than rebuilt. This means compliance grows alongside the business instead of becoming a sudden, overwhelming project further down the line.

Building a Register That Fits Your Business

The most effective environmental legal registers for small businesses share a few common features: they are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect legislative change, they are written in plain language rather than legal jargon, they link each legal requirement to a clear action or evidence of compliance, and they are proportionate — covering what applies, in appropriate detail, without unnecessary bulk.

This is where working with a health and safety and environmental consultancy adds real value. Rather than adapting a generic template, a consultancy can assess your specific activities and premises, identify the environmental legislation that genuinely applies, and build a register that is both legally sound and genuinely usable by your team.

The Bottom Line

Environmental law does not ask how many people are on your payroll before it applies to you — it asks what impact your work creates. That means every business, regardless of size, has environmental obligations worth identifying and managing properly. For small businesses, the smart response is not to ignore this reality, nor to adopt a compliance framework built for a much larger organisation. It is to build an environmental legal register that is concise, proportionate, and tailored to how the business actually operates — one that gets used, kept current, and genuinely supports safer, more compliant, more sustainable day-to-day operations.

If you are unsure which environmental requirements apply to your business, or you would like help building a legal register that is proportionate to your size and sector, our team can help you get a clear, practical picture of your obligations.

Posted on

How to Pinpoint Environmental Legislation for Your Business

Environmental compliance can feel like an impossible maze. Regulations pile up at the local, national, and sometimes international level. They also shift depending on your industry, your size, your location, and even the specific materials you handle. Many business owners freeze at this point, assuming they need a law degree just to figure out where to start.

The good news is that you do not. You do not need to become an environmental lawyer, but you do need to know which requirements apply to your operations. This article walks through a practical process for narrowing down the environmental legislation for businesses that actually matters to your business, so you can focus your time and resources on real compliance instead of guesswork.

Why This Matters Before You Even Start

Non-compliance with environmental law is not a minor administrative slip. Depending on jurisdiction, penalties can include significant fines, operational shutdowns, personal liability for directors, and reputational damage that outlasts any fine. On the other hand, over-compliance — spending resources chasing rules that do not apply to you — wastes money and attention that could go toward growth. Getting the scope right is the foundation of an efficient compliance program.

Step 1: Map Your Business Activities, Not Just Your Industry

Legislation is often triggered by specific activities rather than by industry labels. A “manufacturing” business might trigger air emissions rules because of a paint booth, water discharge rules because of a wash-down process, and hazardous waste rules because of solvent disposal — three separate regulatory regimes from three separate activities.

Start by listing:

  • What raw materials, chemicals, or substances you use, store, or produce
  • What waste streams your operations generate (solid, liquid, air, hazardous)
  • Whether you discharge anything to water, air, or land
  • Whether you import, export, transport, or store regulated goods
  • The physical footprint of your operations (land use, proximity to protected areas or waterways)

This activity-based map is usually far more useful than starting from your business’s official industry classification.

Environmental compliance journey

Step 2: Identify Your Jurisdictional Layers

Environmental law is rarely a single rule book. Most businesses need to check multiple layers:

  • Local rules — SSSI designations, noise, local waste collection and disposal by-laws
  • National legislation — overarching frameworks such as clean air, clean water, or waste management Acts or Statutory Instruments
  • International or trade-related obligations — relevant if you import/export goods or waste, use certain packaging, or operate across borders

A rule of thumb: start at the national level to understand the broad framework, then narrow down to local rules, which often add stricter or more specific obligations on top.

Step 3: Check for Permits and Licensing Triggers

Many environmental obligations are tied to permits rather than blanket rules. Common triggers include:

  • Emitting pollutants above a certain threshold
  • Discharging wastewater
  • Storing hazardous substances above specified quantities
  • Operating certain types of equipment (boilers, generators, refrigeration systems with regulated refrigerants)
  • Extracting or using groundwater

If any of these apply, there is likely a permitting authority you need to register with, and permits often come bundled with monitoring, record keeping, and reporting duties.

Step 4: Look at Size and Threshold Exemptions

Many environmental regulations include size-based thresholds — for example, exemptions or reduced obligations for small quantity generators of waste, or simplified reporting for smaller emitters. Do not assume a regulation applies in full just because it mentions your industry; check the thresholds carefully, since they can significantly change your compliance burden.

Step 5: Use Official Government Resources

Regulatory agencies typically publish guidance documents, compliance checklists, and industry-specific fact sheets designed for non-specialists. These are usually more current and more directly applicable than general online summaries. Useful sources include:

  • National environmental protection agency websites such as the Environment Agency in England and Wales, SEPA in Scotland
  • State or provincial environment department portals such as DEFRA and DAERA
  • Local council or municipal planning and environmental health offices
  • Industry association compliance guides

Step 6: Watch for Sector-Specific Overlays

Certain sectors carry additional layers of regulation on top of general environmental law — food and beverage, construction, agriculture, manufacturing, healthcare, and mining are common examples. If you operate in one of these sectors, check for sector-specific statutes or codes of practice in addition to general environmental legislation.

Step 7: Build a Simple Compliance Register

Once you have identified applicable legislation, do not leave it in your head or in scattered notes. Build a basic register or registers that track:

  • The specific regulation or permit requirement
  • The regulating authority
  • Renewal or reporting deadlines
  • The internal person responsible / procedure applicable
  • Evidence or records required to demonstrate compliance

This turns a one-time research exercise into an ongoing management tool.

Step 8: Know When to Bring in Outside Help

Self-assessment gets you most of the way, but some situations warrant professional input — complex permitting processes, contaminated land issues, mergers or acquisitions involving environmental liabilities, or any situation where the penalties for getting it wrong are severe.

Environmental consultants and lawyers are most valuable when used strategically and will provide real value to the process.

The Benefits of Bringing in an External Consultant

Even with a solid self-assessment process in place, an external environmental consultant can add real value. Consultants work across many businesses and jurisdictions, so they tend to spot applicable legislation and emerging regulatory changes faster than an internal team researching the topic for the first time.

Consultants can also benchmark your operations against industry-specific obligations you might not think to check, verify that thresholds and exemptions have been applied correctly, and flag overlapping requirements between local and national regulators before they become a problem.

Beyond the initial identification exercise, a consultant can help translate legislation into practical action — building or auditing your compliance register, preparing permit applications, and liaising directly with regulators on technical points. For businesses expanding into new activities, new sites, or new jurisdictions, this outside expertise often pays for itself by preventing costly missteps, reducing the time your team spends on unfamiliar regulatory research, and giving management confidence that nothing material has been missed.

Final Thoughts

Identifying which environmental legislation applies to your business is less about legal expertise and more about a structured process. Understand your activities, map the jurisdictional layers, check permitting triggers and thresholds, use official guidance, and keep a living record of what applies. Approached this way, environmental compliance becomes a manageable, ongoing part of running your business rather than an intimidating unknown.

If you would like to see how we can help you identify which environmental legislation applies to your business, please contact one of our team.

Posted on

Proven: Skip Boss Receives a Suspended Prison Term

A skip boss of a business near Braintree that hires out rubbish skips has been sentenced to a 6-month suspended prison term.

Chelmsford magistrates’ court heard about Roy Brett’s “repeated failure” to accept Environment Agency warnings regarding overflowing skips and uncovered waste. Brett’s company, RJ Brett Contracts Ltd, was fined £3,000 for similar offences.

Chair of the bench Andrew McGregor said the site “posed multiple risks to the environment and human safety, including by fire.”

yard full of waste
The yard was full of wood, metal, textiles and builders’ rubbish. 

Between 2024 and this year, Brett refused to comply with repeated orders.

However, Skip boss Brett’s inaction allowed the waste to overflow from an ever-growing number of skips.

Additionally, the site was exposed to the elements, with no sealed drainage.

Roy Brett’s yard is nestled in green fields near Braintree, but he ignored repeated warnings about the number of skips and amount of waste built up at the site

The yard was full of wood, metal, textiles and builders’ rubbish. Hardly any space was left, causing a fire-risk, and a lot of waste was just stored on the ground.  

Brett had claimed he “didn’t do e-mails,” so “missed” written instructions to remove the waste, piled up across the site. But the Environment Agency also warned him in person.

He didn’t have an environmental permit to manage the yard, but finally, after lots of excuses and denial when challenged by the Environment Agency, Brett admitted in court to breaching environmental law. RJ Brett Contracts Ltd was also charged.

Brett faces a custodial sentence if he commits other offences or doesn’t clear the site by November.

Lesley Robertson, enforcement team leader for the Environment Agency in Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk, said:

“It wasn’t credible for an operator like Roy Brett, director of three other waste companies and years of experience, to say he misunderstood the need for an environmental permit or justify having an exemption from needing one. 

“The operation undercut rivals by avoiding permitting and subsistence fees. They also evaded permit conditions designed to protect the environment.”

Essex County Fire and Rescue Service had concerns about the site, too. They told Brett to tidy up the yard, and make sure no waste that could start a fire was brought in.       

The Environment Agency began an investigation into the site in July 2024. Officers found more than a dozen skips brimming with waste. Brett was given 3 months to remove it all.    

Officers were back on site when the deadline passed as the situation hadn’t improved. Brett was then warned the site must be cleaned up, or face prosecution. By early 2025, almost 50 skips filled the yard, some on top of others. Officers also saw large piles of wood and soil. There were also problems with smells.

Brett sought to legitimise his waste operation by registering exemptions from environmental permits that are meant for low-risk activity. But the Environment Agency deregistered the exemptions when the site took on too much waste.   

As well as the order to remove all waste, the 66-year-old, of Winstree Road, Stanway, in Colchester, was sentenced to 6 months in prison, suspended for 18 months. He was ordered to undergo 30 days of rehabilitation activities and told to pay a £154 victim surcharge.

RJ Brett Contracts Ltd was fined £3,000 and must pay a victim surcharge of £1,200, in relation to breaches of the waste removal order. The penalties accompany the custodial sentence and relate to the company’s involvement in those offences.

RJ Brett Contracts Ltd was charged with 4 offences:

  • operating the waste facility at Lanham Green Road in Cressing, without an environmental permit between 3 July 2024 and 31 January 2025;
  • and between 1 February 2025 and 30 January 2026, both contrary to regulations 12 and 38 (1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016;
  • failing to comply with a notice dated 28 November 2024, requiring the company to remove controlled waste from the site by 30 January 2025, contrary to sections 59ZB(2) and 59ZB(6) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990;
  • and keeping controlled waste at the site in a manner likely to cause environmental pollution or harm to human health, contrary to section 33(1)(c) contrary to Section 33(1)(c) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

Roy Brett was also charged with 4 offences:

  • contrary to regulations 12, 38(1)(a) and 41(1) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016, knowing of or contributing to operation of the waste facility at Lanham Green Road, in Cressing, by RJ Brett Contracts Ltd, without an environmental permit between 3 July 2024 31 January 2025;
  • and between 1 February 2025 and 30 January 2026;
  • contrary to section 59(5) and s157(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. knowing of or contributing to RJ Brett Contracts Ltd failing to comply with a notice dated 28 November 2024 served on the company, requiring it to remove controlled waste from the site by 30 January 2025;
  • contrary to sections 33(1)(c) and 157 of the environmental Protection Act 1990, knowing of or contributing to RJ Brett Contracts Ltd keeping controlled waste in a manner likely to cause pollution to the environment or harm to human health.

Anyone can check to see if a site is licensed to receive waste.  The register can be found on the Environment Agency’s website here.

If you require expert assistance for your waste business, please reach out to the Ashbrooke advisory team today.

Posted on

The Essential Guide to Environmental Permit Management Systems

Executive Summary

An environmental permit management system provides a structured framework of procedures to minimise pollution risks from permitted activities.

For regulated waste management, mining, or installation facilities, maintaining a written management system is a regulatory requirement.

This document outlines statutory compliance frameworks, risk assessments, site planning, and operational records to satisfy Environment Agency expectations.

Regulatory context and application requirements

1. Regulatory Context and Application Requirements – Environmental permit management system

The scope and submission requirements depend on the nature of the application.

Moreover, the complexity of site operations determines the system needs, including • Environmental permit management system.

Additionally, Standard Rules permits the – Environmental permit management system.

  • Risk Identification: Specific operational risks are pre-determined within generic risk assessments.
  • Submission Protocol: You do not need to submit the system documentation during the application phase.
  • Deployment Deadline: The complete management system must be fully operational prior to commencing site activities.
  • Regulatory Assessment: Documentation is typically evaluated during the pre-operation site inspection by an Environment Agency officer.
  • Combustible Waste Provision: Standard rules applications involving combustible waste storage require the concurrent submission of a robust Fire Prevention Plan (FPP).
Man sampling water

We manage bespoke permits through the environmental permit management system.

  • Risk Identification: Operational hazards must be explicitly identified via a site-specific risk assessment.
  • Submission Protocol: A comprehensive summary of the management system must be included as part of the formal application pack.
  • Water & Groundwater Exemptions: Standalone water discharge or groundwater activity applications (Forms B6.5 or B6.6) do not require advance submission of the management system summary, but the system must be fully implemented prior to operation.

2. Certified Environmental Management System (EMS) Standards. Additionally, they align with the environmental permit management system to meet regulatory requirements.

For large-scale or high-risk facilities, such as industrial installations and hazardous waste processing operations, the Environment Agency favours these systems.

Moreover, they are part of the environmental permit management system and are built around recognised international frameworks.

Utilising an independently verified system enhances regulatory confidence and can reduce inspections under the OPRA methodology.

As part of the environmental permit management system, operators must state if their system is modelled on accredited standards. Additionally, they should indicate whether it is modelled on any listed standards.

Note: Accredited certification (verified by UKAS) demonstrates robust governance, but it does not absolve the operator of liability.

However, this does not absolve the operator of liability for individual permit breaches within the environmental permit management system.

3. Site Infrastructure and Spatial Planning Requirements are addressed within the environmental permit management system.

Operators must compile scaled, detailed site plans showing where permits and exemptions take place within the environmental permit management system. Additionally, high-risk or complex sites frequently require multiple standalone drawings to fulfil regulatory requirements.

Core infrastructure components (Waste, Installations, and Mining) are central to the environmental permit management system.

Site plans for the management system must clearly mark the locations of the following assets.

Additionally, this relates to the environmental permit management system.

  • Structural Assets: Buildings, treatment facilities, incinerators, silos, and perimeter security fencing.
  • Hazardous Storage: Containment areas for oils, fuel tanks, chemical bunds, and raw waste stock.
  • Emergency Equipment: Spill kits, absorbents, and critical emergency response machinery.
  • Logistics Access: Dedicated entry and exit pathways for emergency service vehicles.
  • Pollution Control Points: Environmental monitoring stations, sampling points, and inspection manholes.
  • Effluent Infrastructure: Trade effluent or sewage treatment plants and final discharge outfalls.
  • Historical Liabilities: Any parcels of land with known or suspected historical ground contamination.

Additionally, mapping of drainage and utilities supports the environmental permit management system for regulatory compliance.

Drainage networks require precise colour-coding and directional labelling. Additionally, implementing an environmental permit management system supports consistent labelling and compliance.

  • Foul and Combined Drainage: Must be marked clearly in red.
  • Surface Water Drainage: Must be marked clearly in blue.
  • Flow Mechanics: Plans must display water flow direction, discharge connection points (to sewer, soak-away, or watercourse), manhole covers, interceptor tanks, and isolating stop/diverter valves.
  • Utility Routing: Main inlets and distribution paths for mains water, gas, and electricity must be charted, with explicit positioning of water stop taps and utility isolation switches.

Additionally, standalone water discharge and groundwater activities are managed under the environmental permit management system.

Furthermore, for point-source water and groundwater authorisations, the site plan must isolate within the environmental permit management system.

  • The wastewater treatment infrastructure.
  • Statutory sample collection and monitoring points.
  • Mitigation infrastructure and environmental emergency equipment.
  • The defined surface water outlet or groundwater infiltration system.
  • The designated field boundaries for land-spreading activities (where applicable).

4. Operational Control Plans and Specific Sub-Systems for the environmental permit management system.

A compliant management system breaks down site operations into distinct phases.

Additionally, start-up, normal operation, and shut-down are the phases for the environmental permit management system.

Operators must identify the environmental risks associated with each sub-process and outline specific mitigation actions.

Waste storage plans are integral to the environmental permit management system and ensure safe, compliant operations.

Waste facility operators must document an explicit waste storage strategy detailing.

In addition, this record should be maintained in the environmental permit management system.

  • Maximum storage duration thresholds for every distinct waste streams.
  • Control measures to prevent emissions during extended storage.
  • Absolute volume limits and maximum pile heights for all stored materials.
  • Waste identification procedures and strict segregation protocols for incompatible materials.
  • Pre-acceptance and acceptance procedures to prevent the receipt of unpermitted waste.

The environmental permit management system manages Fire Prevention Plans (FPP).

Facilities storing combustible waste must submit a standalone, robust Fire Prevention Plan detailing prevention, detection, containment, and mitigation measures.

Within the environmental permit management system, the Environment Agency assesses these plans stringently against hourly review rates.

Consequently, failing to secure approval on initial submission significantly elevates regulatory costs.

Site Condition Reports (SCR) relate to the environmental permit management system.

For installations, waste operations, and mining permits, a Site Condition Report must be maintained throughout the lifecycle of the permit. This document logs historical spills, baseline land/groundwater data, and evidence verifying effectiveness in the environmental permit management system. It serves as the primary legal benchmark when applying to surrender a permit.

Standalone Environmental Management Documents cover the environmental permit management system and its related compliance.

Depending on site risks, the Environment Agency will require separate, standalone document submissions for individual environmental vectors.

Consequently, this enables the environmental permit management system to support distinct internal specialist reviews.

  • Odour Management Plan (OMP)
  • Emissions Management Plan (EMP)
  • Noise and Vibration Management Plan (NVMP)
  • Pests Management Plan (PMP)

5. Additionally, Contingency, Emergency, and Climate Change Resilience within the environmental permit management system.

Accident prevention and risk mitigation are essential in the environmental permit management system.

Operators must maintain emergency contingency frameworks that assess the likelihood and consequences of unexpected disruptions.

Additionally, the system must outline proactive preventative actions and emergency response procedures for environmental permit management system.

  • Core equipment breakdowns or sudden utility failures.
  • Enforced or emergency facility shutdowns.
  • Vandalism, security breaches, and deliberate damage.
  • Fires, flash flooding, and severe weather anomalies.

Emergency documentation must include formal accident logging forms, emergency contact directories, and a transparent review schedule. Additionally, operators should actively engage local emergency services and verify flood warning registrations within the environmental permit management system.

Cyber security protocols are essential and an environmental permit management system can support compliance and business continuity.

Modern waste infrastructure and environmental monitoring systems rely heavily on automated computer control systems. Additionally, operators must integrate risk controls aligned with NCSC guidelines to protect software in the environmental permit management system.

Climate Change Adaptation Strategy supports the environmental permit management system to enhance resilience.

In accordance with UK climate projections, operators must evaluate the long-term impact of severe weather shifts on permit compliance. Additionally, these shifts are relevant to the environmental permit management system.

  • Short-to-Medium Term: Operational processes must show resilience against a 2°C global mean temperature rise by 2050.
  • Long-Term Asset Planning: For long-lifecycle facilities, operators must evaluate potential risks up to a 4°C temperature rise by 2100.
  • Methodology: Risk assessments should leverage ISO 14090:2019 standards and the Environment Agency’s industry sector examples for climate adaptation.

6. Corporate Governance, Training, and Audits

Moreover, staff competence and training infrastructure supports operational effectiveness in the environmental permit management system.

For the environmental permit management system, compliance with the permit requires adequate resource allocation and clearly defined operational roles. Additionally, operators must establish formal procedures.

  • Assign and document individual technical competence responsibilities.
  • Verify external contractor credentials and internal staff qualifications.
  • Maintain central registries of regulatory certifications, safety inductions, and refresher training.

Public Information Provisions outline the environmental permit management system.

Waste and installation permits carry a statutory obligation.

Maintain a clearly visible, weatherproof notice board at the site entrance as part of the environmental permit management system.

The board must display:

  • The registered permit holder’s corporate name.
  • A designated 24/7 emergency contact name and phone number.
  • Explicit confirmation that the facility is regulated by the Environment Agency.
  • The unique environmental permit reference number.
  • Statutory Environment Agency contact numbers: General Enquiries (03708 506506) and the Incident Hotline (0800 807060).

7. Record keeping, auditing, and system reviews support environmental permit management system.

This statutory record retention checklist applies to the environmental permit management system.

Operators must maintain structured archives documenting the active execution of the permit management system. Critical records include:

  • Current and historical environmental permits and legal variations.
  • Comprehensive risk assessments and secondary management plans (e.g., Mops).
  • Detailed calibration records for environmental monitoring and sampling equipment.
  • Logs of all internal compliance checks, audit findings, and remedial actions.
  • Formal complaints ledgers detailing root-cause investigations and resolution outcomes.

Waste Transfer Log Obligations

For every incoming delivery of waste material, operators must capture and preserve the following metrics:

  • Absolute quantity (verified weight or volume).
  • The statutory six-digit List of Waste (LoW) Code.
  • Origin location and complete corporate identity of the waste producer.
  • Date and time of arrival on site.
  • The original generation date (mandatory for odorous or putrescible waste streams).
  • Detailed containment logs for any rejected or quarantined materials.

Mandatory System Review Triggers

A permit management system is a dynamic document. It must be updated immediately upon the occurrence of any of the following events:

  • Technical modifications to onsite machinery, infrastructure, or operational capacities.
  • The submission of an application to vary the existing environmental permit.
  • Post-incident reviews following a site accident, permit breach, or formal complaint.
  • The introduction of new environmental controls to mitigate an emerging risk.

8. Site Closure and Permit Surrender

Environmental permits cannot be abandoned unilaterally when operations cease. Legal obligations remain active until the Environment Agency formally approves a Permit Surrender Application.

For landfills and Category A mining waste facilities, a transitional period of site closure applies. During this phase, operators must maintain active emissions monitoring regimes and submit final site closure updates via the Site Condition Report, proving conclusively that the land and groundwater have been returned to a satisfactory state.

Technical Support and Consultancy

Developing, implementing, and defending a regulatory management system requires specialist technical oversight. For bespoke assistance with permit applications, Fire Prevention Plans, or standalone environmental management documents, contact our regulatory advisory team for professional consultation.

Posted on

Raw Sewage Enforcement Undertaking

An investigation by the Environment Agency into Severn Trent Water has resulted in an Enforcement Undertaking by the water company.  The investigation revealed that raw sewage from a blocked sewer had been discharged into a brook near Gloucester – impacting about 1.7km of the watercourse.

The case has ended in the water company agreeing an Enforcement Undertaking (EU) with the Environment Agency and giving Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust £327,500.

Enforcement undertaking sewage

An EU is a voluntary offer made by companies and individuals and can be accepted where the Environment Agency has reason to believe an offence has been committed.

It usually includes a payment to an environmental charity to carry out improvements. The Environment Agency received reports of dead fish on 19 August 2021 at School Lane, Quedgeley, near Gloucester.

An inspection revealed hundreds of dead sticklebacks and thousands of dead invertebrates plus several eels and a number of bullhead fish.

The Agency officer also observed what he believed to be sewage fungus growing in the watercourse for about 1km up to Meerbrook Way. The smell of sewage was strong, and the fungus was covering the entire width of the brook.

Further investigations revealed that where the brook exited the A38 at Meerbrook Way, the officer saw what he believed to be a discharge of crude sewage coming out of the bankside into the brook.

An ecological impact assessment concluded that 1.7km of Dimore Brook had been affected and that the vast majority of aquatic animal life had been killed by the sewage discharge.

Between Fisher’s Bridge and the Gloucester-Sharpness Canal, approximately 50 dead European eel, 20 bullhead, 3 chub and 400 three-spined sticklebacks were observed. Environment Agency officers said that Severn Trent had responded to the incident in a timely manner.

Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust is using the funds in a three-year programme to improve various projects close to the impacted area.

Ian Skuse, the investigating officer for the West Midlands Environment Agency, said:

Protecting the environment in the West Midlands and taking action against those that damage or threaten this is our utmost priority.

While we will always take forward prosecutions in the most serious cases, Enforcement Undertakings are an effective enforcement tool to allow companies to put things right and contribute to environmental improvements.

They allow polluters to correct and restore the harm caused to the environment and prevent repeat incidents by improving their procedures, helping ensure future compliance with environmental requirements.

Sophie Wootton-Lee, head of external affairs at Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, said:

The money received as a result of this incident will be spent close to where it took place, to benefit the wildlife and people who live in and around the wetlands near Gloucester.

For Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust this is essential – spending the money close to where the damage has occurred, to try and mitigate some of that impact.

The project is complex and will deliver a range of elements, including habitat creation and restoration.

We’ll also be looking to increase the habitat provided in the area for an iconic Gloucestershire species, the European eel, by creating pond complexes, reedbeds, scrapes and carrying out wet ditch restoration.

Emma Hardy, Minister for Water and Flooding said:

Pollution incidents like this are unacceptable and have a devastating impact on the environment and local communities.

This Government will never look the other way while water companies pump record levels of sewage into our rivers, lakes and seas.

We will strengthen regulation, crack down on water companies and begin the work of cleaning up Britain’s waterways. As an immediate step, the Water (Special Measures) Bill will strengthen regulation including new powers to ban the payment of bonuses for polluting water bosses and bring criminal charges against persistent law breakers.

Background to the Enforcement Undertaking

An Enforcement Undertaking is available to the Environment Agency (EA) as an alternative sanction to prosecution or monetary penalty for dealing with certain environmental offences.

It is a legally binding voluntary agreement proposed by a business (or an individual) when the EA has reasonable grounds to suspect that an environmental offence has occurred.

Enforcement Undertakings for environmental offences were first introduced under the Environmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010 and the Environmental Civil Sanctions (Miscellaneous Amendments) (England) Regulations 2010 but have since been made available for other environmental offences, including under the Environmental Permitting Regulations.

Accepting an Enforcement Undertaking is always at the discretion of the EA. However, if accepted the EU helps firms and individuals who have damaged the environment or operated outside of legislative requirements to complete actions which will address the cause and effect of their offending, including making a payment to an appropriate project.

EUs can be offered for offences including polluting rivers, breaching permit conditions designed to protect communities, or failing to register and comply with recycling/recovery obligations. The Environment Agency then carefully considers whether the actions offered by the offender are acceptable. 

Why use Enforcement Undertakings? 

  • Businesses will voluntarily secure compliance now and in the future, without attracting a criminal record. 
  • The environment, local community and those directly impacted by the offending can benefit through actions being offered in an EU. 
  • They allow the EA to deal with the less intentional and polluting offending in a more proportionate way than prosecution through the criminal courts.  

The Environment Agency reserves the right to prosecute or impose a monetary penalty, where offenders fail to comply with the terms of an Enforcement Undertaking offer. 

If you require environmental advice for your business, please contact one of the Ashbrooke team.

Posted on

Why you need a waste audit

In this article we look at why you need a waste audit and the benefits from it. In the United Kingdom, businesses and organisations are increasingly recognising the critical role that waste audits play in their sustainability efforts. A waste audit is a detailed analysis of an entity’s waste stream, identifying what types of waste are being produced, in what quantities, and how they are being managed. This process is not only a regulatory requirement but also a step towards environmental responsibility and cost efficiency.

It is estimated that the UK generated 40.4 million tonnes of commercial and industrial (C&I) waste in 2020, of which 33.8 million tonnes (84%) was generated in England. The latest estimates for England only, indicate that C&I waste generation was around 33.9 million tonnes in 2021.

Why you need a waste audit

The UK’s stringent waste management regulations, governed by the Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011, mandate businesses to classify, segregate, and store waste appropriately. Waste audits provide tangible evidence of compliance with these legal requirements, helping businesses avoid potential fines and legal issues. Moreover, they ensure that Environmental Management System (EMS) certification standards are met, which can be crucial for maintaining corporate reputation and consumer trust.

Waste audit steps

Conducting a waste audit involves several steps, starting with understanding the different types of waste produced by the organisation. It is essential to set a specific time frame for the audit, ideally during a typical operational period to get an accurate representation of the waste generated. The audit can highlight inefficiencies in waste management practices and identify opportunities for reducing waste production, promoting recycling, and improving overall environmental performance.

For businesses looking to conduct a waste audit, there are resources available that provide guidance on the process. These include six-step guides that cover everything from understanding your waste to implementing changes that can reduce waste collection and disposal costs while minimising the amount of waste sent to landfills. Companies may also engage specialist consultants to undertake the audit and report on its findings.

The benefits of waste audits extend beyond regulatory compliance. They can showcase a company’s eco-friendly credentials, secure new customers, access better loans, win prestigious awards, and even cash in on selected grants. In the UK’s business landscape, being green is no longer just a trend, it is a real competitive advantage!

Waste audits are an indispensable tool for businesses aiming to improve their sustainability. They provide a systematic approach to understanding and managing waste, leading to significant environmental and financial benefits. As the country continues to strive for a greener future, waste audits will undoubtedly remain a cornerstone of corporate environmental strategy.

Common Findings in UK Waste Audits: Insights and Implications

Waste audits are a critical component of waste management strategies across the UK, providing valuable insights into the types and quantities of waste produced by businesses and organisations. These audits often reveal common trends and issues that, when addressed, can lead to significant improvements in waste management practices.

One of the most frequent findings in waste audits is the high volume of recyclable materials that are incorrectly disposed of as general waste. This not only includes common items like paper, cardboard, and plastics but also electronic waste and certain types of glass. The mismanagement of these recyclable materials not only impacts the environment but also represents a lost opportunity for businesses to reduce waste disposal costs.  More importantly, it may also be illegal and put the company at risk of prosecution by enforcement authorities such as the Environment Agency.

Another common observation is the lack of proper segregation at the source. Many businesses fail to implement effective waste separation practices, leading to contamination of recycling streams and increased processing costs. Education and training for staff on how to correctly segregate waste can mitigate this issue and enhance the efficiency of recycling programs.

Food waste is another significant component of the waste stream, often due to over-purchasing, improper storage, and lack of composting options. This not only contributes to the environmental problem of methane emissions from landfills but also represents a substantial financial loss for businesses.

In addition to these, waste audits frequently identify the presence of hazardous waste in general waste bins. This includes items like batteries, chemicals, and medical waste, which require special handling and disposal methods to prevent harm to the environment and human health.

The findings from waste audits can serve as a catalyst for change, prompting businesses to adopt more sustainable waste management practices. By addressing the common issues identified, companies can improve their operational efficiency, comply with regulatory requirements, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

For businesses looking to conduct their own waste audits, there are numerous resources and professional services available to guide them through the process. These services can provide tailored advice and solutions to help businesses optimise their waste management systems and achieve their sustainability goals.

Waste audits consistently uncover areas where businesses can improve their waste management practices. By acting on these findings, businesses can not only reduce their environmental impact but also realise financial savings and enhance their reputation as responsible corporate citizens.

Measuring the Impact of Waste Audits in UK Businesses

Businesses are increasingly aware of the importance of sustainability and waste reduction. Measuring the impact of these efforts is crucial for understanding their effectiveness and for making informed decisions on future waste management strategies.

Here are some key methods that businesses can employ to measure the impact of their waste reduction efforts:

Waste Audit Analysis

Conducting regular waste audits is a foundational step. By analysing the types and quantities of waste produced, businesses can identify key areas for reduction and track progress over time.

Recycling Rates

Monitoring the percentage of waste that is recycled is a straightforward metric. It provides insight into how much waste is being diverted from landfills and can be a strong indicator of the success of recycling programs.

Employee Engagement

Gathering feedback from employees can offer a qualitative measure of the waste reduction culture within a business. Engaged employees are more likely to follow sustainable practices and contribute to waste reduction goals.

Financial Savings

Tracking cost savings from reduced waste disposal fees can quantify the financial impact. Additionally, savings from reusing materials or selling recyclable waste can be factored into this metric.

Environmental Impact

Calculating the reduction in carbon footprint or other environmental metrics can demonstrate the broader impact of waste reduction efforts. This can include measurements like greenhouse gas emissions avoided by recycling and reusing materials.

Sustainability Reporting

Creating detailed sustainability reports that include waste reduction metrics can help businesses communicate their progress to stakeholders and customers, enhancing their reputation and potentially leading to increased business opportunities.

Waste Audit Benchmarking

Comparing waste reduction metrics against industry benchmarks or past performance can provide context for the impact of a business’s efforts. This can help set realistic goals and drive continuous improvement.

Certifications and Awards

Achieving certifications or awards for environmental performance can serve as a measure of a business’s commitment to waste reduction and sustainability. These recognitions often have criteria based on measurable waste reduction achievements.

Waste audit conclusions

The benefits of waste audits extend beyond regulatory compliance. They can showcase a company’s eco-friendly credentials, secure new customers, access better loans, win prestigious awards, and even cash in on selected grants.

By employing these methods, businesses can effectively measure the impact of their waste reduction efforts, demonstrating their commitment to sustainability and reaping the associated benefits. For more detailed guidance on implementing these measures, businesses can contact one of the Ashbrooke team.

Posted on

Dairy farmer pollution prosecution

A Wellington dairy farmer pollution prosecution following incident after slurry entered watercourse.

A farmer has been given 14 weeks in prison suspended for a year and ordered to pay £10,000 costs after he persistently allowed slurry to run off into a stream near his farm.

David Bartlett, aged 70, of Upcott Dairy Farm, Sampford Arundel, Wellington, appeared for sentencing before District Judge Brereton at Taunton magistrates’ court on Thursday 18 July.

Dairy farmer pollution prosecution

He had previously pleaded guilty to three offences relating to pollution to the Westford stream, a tributary of the River Tone. He was also ordered to pay £154 victim surcharge.

In a case brought by the Environment Agency, the court heard that the farm had a long history of failing to properly contain slurry and had been warned several times in the past for causing pollution of the Westford stream.

In October 2022, Agency officers installed remote monitoring equipment on the stream which confirmed regular pollution events were continuing to occur.

Using the data from the remote monitoring, officers went to the monitoring site in December 2022 where they found significant amounts of sewage fungus contaminating the bed of the watercourse, an indication of persistent pollution.

Pollution resulted in poor quality of water

Continuing upstream towards Upcott Dairy Farm, colonies of bloodworm were evident. These are a species of pollution tolerant organism associated with poor water quality. No invertebrate life forms were noted when stones in the stream bed were turned over, further indicating the poor quality of the water.

Near the farm, one of the officers saw a nearby ditch had suddenly started to discharge a significant amount of effluent with the appearance and smell of slurry. The source was quickly traced to an overflowing underground slurry tank on Upcott Dairy Farm.

Officers also investigated the system used for applying slurry to fields. Typically, farmers will use slurry to provide nutrients to their crops or grass. Bartlett was using a simple pipe to dispose of slurry in a single location.

Although not discharging slurry at the time of the pollution event inspection, it was clear there was significant contamination of slurry around the end of the pipe and evidence that slurry had tracked down the field toward the Westford stream.

A subsequent visit found slurry being pumped on to waterlogged land with no attempt to use the slurry for crop benefit. The slurry was several inches thick in the field indicating it had been pumped over a prolonged duration in the same location.

Toward the bottom of the field there was a significant build-up of mud and slurry either side of the gateway crossing the stream. This too presented a risk of further runoff pollution into the stream.

Pollution survey revealed stream affected for 2.5km

A biologist’s survey and report confirmed that the Westford stream had experienced repeated, acute and sustained chronic pollution events by slurry. Lack of slurry storage had led to slurry being pumped inappropriately on to a single patch of land where it was likely to run-off and cause pollution.

Dairy farmer pollution prosecution

Bartlett had failed, despite repeated warnings, to install slurry storage facilities that would allow slurry to be stored during winter when ground conditions were unsuitable.

The report stated there had been “a significant negative impact on the aquatic invertebrate community and water quality along 2.5km of Westford stream.”

Bartlett submitted a statement to the Environment Agency in which he made limited admissions, implying others, such as his neighbour and the local authority were responsible. He denied deliberately pumping slurry into the watercourse.

Judge Brereton said there were significant aggravating features in the case, including Bartlett having previously been warned over causing pollution, his failure to carry out proper checks or make structural improvements by way of an adequate, compliant slurry storage system which is capable of storing slurry having received funds from the Rural Payments Agency to pay for infrastructure that would improve the environment and not cause significant, sustained pollution incidents.

Dairy farmer repeatedly ‘failed to acknowledge’ advice

David Womack of the Environment Agency said:

This farmer has, over the years, caused numerous pollution incidents and he has repeatedly failed to acknowledge the advice given or to improve the facilities for storing or properly using slurry.

For over 30 years there has been legislation in place requiring all livestock farmers to have storage facilities capable of storing a minimum of four months’ slurry production. The 2018 Reduction and prevention of Agricultural Diffuse Pollution Regulations now also require farmers to plan all applications of slurry in order to reduce the risk of pollution. Pumping slurry on to waterlogged land is unlawful and is likely to cause diffuse pollution.

We hope Mr Bartlett will now work with us to voluntarily improve the facilities at Upcott Dairy Farm. If he doesn’t, we won’t hesitate to use other legislative powers to reduce the risk of further pollution

Pollution prosecution charges

The charges against the defendant were:

  1. On and before the 2 December 2022 you, David Bartlett, did cause an unpermitted water discharge activity, namely the discharge of poisonous, noxious or polluting matter from Upcott Dairy Farm, Sampford Arundel, Wellington, Somerset, into inland fresh waters contrary to Regulations 12(1)(b) and Regulation 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.
  2. On and before the 2 December 2022 you, David Bartlett, a Land Manager did not ensure that organic matter, namely cattle slurry, was not applied to agricultural land that was waterlogged, flooded or snow covered in that you applied organic fertilizer to waterlogged ground contrary to Regulation 3(a) and 11 of the Reduction and prevention of Agricultural Diffuse Pollution (England) Regulations 2018
  3. On and before the 2 December 2022 you, David Bartlett, a Land Manager did not ensure that for each application of organic or manufactured fertilizer to agricultural land, the application was planned so as not to give rise to a significant risk of agricultural diffuse pollution contrary to Regulation 4(1)(a)(ii) and 11 of the Reduction and Prevention of Agricultural Diffuse Pollution (England) Regulations 2018.

Prevent pollution with effective slurry management

Effective slurry management is crucial for both environmental sustainability and farm productivity. Here are some best practices for slurry management in the UK:

  1. Assess Nutrient Content: Use tools like the Nutrient Management Guide (RB209) to determine the nutrient content of your slurry. This helps in applying the right amount to meet crop needs.
  2. Proper Storage: Ensure you have enough well-maintained storage to hold slurry until conditions are optimal for spreading. Covering slurry stores or allowing a natural crust to form can reduce ammonia emissions.
  3. Application Timing: Spread slurry when crops can best utilize the nutrients, typically during the growing season. Avoid spreading during wet conditions to prevent runoff and water pollution.
  4. Application Methods: Use low-emission spreading techniques such as trailing shoe or injection methods to minimize ammonia loss and improve nutrient uptake by crops.
  5. Safety Measures: Always prioritize safety when handling slurry. Ensure proper ventilation and avoid entering enclosed slurry spaces due to the risk of toxic gases.
  6. Compliance with Regulations: Stay updated with local regulations and take advantage of available grants and support schemes, such as the Slurry Investment Scheme (SIS), to improve your slurry management practices.

Implementing these practices can help you manage slurry more effectively, benefiting both your farm and the environment.

If you require environmental advice for your business, please contact one of the Ashbrooke team.

Posted on

Large scale illegal waste crime in Staffordshire

Multiple people involved in large scale illegal waste crime in Staffordshire are facing prison following a successful prosecution by the Environment Agency.

The sentencing, which led to the conviction of 5 of the defendants, took place on 2 April 2024, at Shrewsbury Crown Court sitting at Telford Magistrates, following an 8-week trial in September and October 2023.

The prosecution concerned a large-scale illegal dumping of waste at Bonnie Braes Farm in Staffordshire, with offences taking place between 1 March 2014 and 30 June 2015.  

At least 100,000 tonnes of waste was brought onto the site during the charge period, when there was no legal right to do so. This activity included a significant amount waste from excavation, alongside other mixed refuse and some asbestos.

The volume of waste added to the site meant that the land was raised by 6 – 7 metres in height. Additional concern was created by the crucial gas distribution pipeline which passes underneath Bonnie Braes Farm, one of two that supplies Stoke-on-Trent. A fracture of the pipeline would have had devastating consequences, causing disruption to the supply of gas as well as the potential closure of the busy A500 road for a significant period.

Mr Recorder Nicholls, found that the offending caused Category 1 harm to the environment due to the eyesore that the deposits caused. In considering the large scale illegal waste crime in Staffordshire, he stated the impact that the weight had on the site, created negative effects not only to the gas pipeline but also to a culvert on the site, which was found to have collapsed, causing significant flooding to the land in heavy rain. The operation of the site also caused significant disruption on lanes that were unsuitable for large vehicles and the tracking of mud from the site across the roads. 

Large scale illegal waste crime in Staffordshire

We are glad to see the outcome of these prosecutions and will continue to work tirelessly to tackle environmental crime.  Illegal waste sites like this, undermine legitimate businesses, undercut their prices, and blight the environment. We would urge everyone to check that a waste site is licenced before using them by checking the public register online at GOV.UK. If people suspect criminal activity, they should report it to our 24-hour incident hotline 0800 807060 or anonymously through CrimeStoppers on 0800 555111.

Environment Agency Spokesperson

Large Scale Illegal Waste Crime Sentences

Mr Recorder Nicholls imposed the sentences as follows:

Raymond Bowden,64 of Liverpool Road, Church Lawton, was sentenced to 30 months immediate custody. He was also disqualified from holding the position of a director for a period of 8 years and 3 months. A Proceeds of Crime Application is outstanding and will be determined at a future date.

Joe Frizell, 48 of Crewe Road, Shavington, was sentenced to 2 years immediate custody. He was also disqualified from holding the position of a director for a period of 6 years. A Proceeds of Crime Application is outstanding and will be determined at a future date.

James Bowden, 44 of Bignall Hill, Bignall End was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment that was immediately suspended for 18 months. He must undertake 240 hours of unpaid work. He was also disqualified from holding the position of a director for a period of 5 years. A Proceeds of Crime Application is outstanding and will be determined at a future date.

Victoria Webb-Johnson, 47 of Sydney Road, Crewe was sentenced to 10 weeks imprisonment suspended for 12 months. She was also ordered to pay a contribution towards the costs of the prosecution of £8000 and the victim surcharge.

Stefan Paraszko, 66 of High Street Silverdale, was sentenced to 11 months imprisonment that was immediately suspended for 18 months and the victim surcharge.

VWJ Earth Moving Limited was fined £11,000 and ordered to pay a contribution towards the costs of the prosecution of £8000 and the victim surcharge

Jumbo Waste and Metal Limited was fined £1, as the company is in liquidation, and the victim surcharge.

TW Frizell (Haulage & Plant Hire) Ltd was fined £1, as the company is in liquidation, and the victim surcharge.

Joe Frizell was also sentenced alongside RJC Regeneration Limited in respect of a matter that occurred at Elms Farm, Betley, Crewe. In that case waste was deposited without the benefit of an Environmental Permit and exceeded the allowances of any waste exemptions. 

In respect of the Elms Farm case, Mr Recorder Nicholls imposed the following sentences:

Joe Frizell was sentenced to 2 months immediate custody to run concurrently with his other sentence – this means he received a total of 2 years immediate custody overall.

RJC Regeneration Limited was fined £8000 and the victim surcharge

Further information

In the matter large scale illegal waste crime in Staffordshire from Chester Crown Court, Joe Frizell, RJC Regeneration Ltd and Mark Oulton pleaded guilty on 18 July 2023 to offences relating to the depositing of illegal waste at Doddlespool Farm and Elms Farm, Crewe at Chester Crown Court on 18 July 2023.

Mark Oulton, 53 of Main Road, Betley, was sentenced by Chester Crown Court on 8 September 2023 to 9 months custody suspended for 18 months. In addition, he was sentenced to 130 hours unpaid work, a £5000 fine and ordered to pay a contribution towards the prosecution costs of £27,000. Mr Oulton was also made subject to a court order requiring him to remove waste illegally deposited and stored on Doddlespool Farm by 8 September 2024.  

Large Scale Illegal Waste Crime Charges

Jumbo Waste & Metals Ltd 

Jumbo Waste & Metals Ltd did between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, contravened regulation 12(1) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 operate a regulated facility on land known as Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End, without the authorisation of an environmental permit, contrary to Regulation 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. 

Raymond Bowden

Raymond Bowden did between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, contravened regulation 12(1) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 operate a regulated facility on land known as Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End, without the authorisation of an environmental permit, contrary to Regulation 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. 

James Bowden

Between the 12th January 2015 and the 30th June 2015, Jumbo Waste & Metals Ltd contravened regulation 12 of the environmental permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 by operating a regulated facility at Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End outside the terms of authorisation of an environmental permit and this offence was committed with the consent or connivance or was attributable to the neglect of James Bowden, being a director of the said company, contrary to Regulation 38(1) and Regulation 41(1) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. 

Stefan Paraszko 

Stefan Paraszko pleaded guilty to between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, contravened regulation 12(1) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 operating a regulated facility on land known as Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End, without the authorisation of an environmental permit, contrary to Regulation 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. 

TW Frizell (Haulage & Plant Hire) Ltd

TW Frizell (Haulage & Plant Hire) Ltd, between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, deposited controlled waste on land at Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End when there was no environmental permit in force authorising the deposits, contrary to sections 33(1)(a) and 33(6) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.   

Joe Frizell

Between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, TW Frizell (Haulage & Plant Hire) Ltd deposited controlled waste on land at Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End when there was no environmental permit in force authorising the deposits and this offence was committed with the consent or connivance or was attributable to the neglect of Joe Frizell, being a director of the said company, contrary to sections 33(1)(a), 33(6) and 157(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. 

VWJ Earthmoving Ltd 

VWJ Earthmoving Ltd pleaded guilty to between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, depositing controlled waste on land at Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End when there was no environmental permit in force authorising the deposits, contrary to sections 33(1)(a) and 33(6) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.   

Victoria Webb-Johnson 

Victoria Webb-Johnson pleaded guilty to between the 1st March 2014 and the 30th June 2015, VWJ Earthmoving Ltd deposited controlled waste on land at Bonnie Braes Farm, Bignall End when there was no environmental permit in force authorising the deposits and this offence was committed with the consent or connivance or was attributable to the neglect of Victoria Webb-Johnson, being the director of the said company, contrary to sections 33(1)(a), 33(6) and 157(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. 

Chester Court Charges

Mark Oulton

Between 16 February 2018 to 22 March 2021 at Doddlespool Farm, Main Road, Betley, Crewe, CW3 9AE, Mark  Oulton did operate a regulated facility, namely a waste operation for storage of waste, except under and to the extent authorised by an environmental permit, contrary to Regulations 12 and 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.

Between 3 October 2017 to 22 March 2021 at Elms Farm, Betley Road, Betley, Crewe, Mark Oulton did operate a regulated facility, namely a waste operation for storage of waste, except under and to the extent authorised by an environmental permit, contrary to Regulations 12 and 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.

RJC Regeneration Ltd 

Between 3 October 2017 to 23 March 2018 at Elms Farm, Betley Road, Betley, Crewe, RJC Regeneration Ltd did deposit waste on land without the benefit of an environmental permit contrary to Section 33(1)(a) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

Joe Frizell 

Between 3 October 2017 to 23 March 2018 at Elms Farm, Betley Road, Betley, Crewe, RJC Regeneration Ltd did deposit waste on land without the benefit of an environmental permit and that offence was committed with the consent, connivance or was attributable to the neglect of Joe Frizell contrary to Sections 33(1)(a) and 157 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

If you require advice on environmental permits or waste exemptions, please contact one of the Ashbrooke team.

Posted on

Pollution enforcement undertaking

A company which handles hazardous waste has agreed a pollution enforcement undertaking with the regulator. The company made a payment of £25,000 to an environmental charity following the contamination of groundwater at its site.

Augean South Limited of Stamford Road, Kings Cliffe, Northamptonshire also paid £11,058.90 to cover the costs of the Environment Agency investigation.

The discharge in 2020 had a short-term impact on wildlife and saw some amphibian species decline but populations recovered by the following summer. Vegetation also naturally improved after the pollution.

Routine inspections in March 2020, detected high levels of chemicals in the groundwater adjacent to the treatment centre at East Northants Resource Management Facility. The site is operated by Augean South Limited.

After performing further tests, Augean notified the Environment Agency. Officers concluded Augean had negligently exceeded its environmental permits, contrary to regulations 12(1)(b) and 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.

The Environment Agency accepted an Enforcement Undertaking submitted by Augean.

Enforcement undertakings are one of the civil sanctions available to the Environment Agency, enabling the wrongdoer to put right the situation and compensate for any environmental harm.

As part of this agreement, Augean donated £25,000 to the Rockingham Forest Trust, a local charity which promotes environmental projects in Northamptonshire.

It is believed that heavy rainfall during the winter and subsequent storms contributed to the chemical discharge.

The Environment Agency was satisfied Augean took appropriate action to resolve the situation. The company had acted in a timely manner to remove and clean the affected land, whilst continuing to monitor the groundwater and soil.  There have been no similar incidents since at the waste facility.

Enforcement undertaking

An Enforcement Undertaking is a voluntary offer made by an offender to:

  • put right the effects of their offending
  • put right the impact on third parties
  • make sure the offence cannot happen again

Where the Environment Agency accepts the offer, it becomes a legally binding agreement between the Agency and the business or person who makes the offer. The regulator will only consider accepting an enforcement undertaking in cases where:

  • it is not in the public interest to prosecute
  • the offer itself addresses the cause and effect of the offending
  • the offer protects, restores or enhances the natural capital of England

The Environment Agency publishes details of all enforcement undertakings on its website.

pollution enforcement undertaking
Enforcement undertakings can be offered following pollution incidents (stock image)

The Agency is more likely to accept offers when they are offered early and proactively.  Generally, the regulator will only consider accepting an enforcement undertaking offer when:

  • they are confident the terms of the enforcement undertaking will be complied with
  • they believe a breach of relevant legislation has occurred
  • they consider the enforcement undertaking to be the correct regulatory outcome taking into account (i) the nature of the offence and its impact, and (ii) other forms of enforcement available, to remedy the issues concerned, to the environment and the community
  • the offer is above what the company would normally need to do to comply
  • the offer is given in good faith
  • the offeror makes a positive commitment, at the right company level to stop the offending conduct or alleged breach and to maintain compliance
  • the offeror rectifies the consequences of the conduct, including interacting with any third party affected by the offence
  • the offer does not contain restrictions on how the Agency may publish its acceptance in cases involving pollution of the environment or harm to human health and it is demonstrated that any necessary remediation or restoration work commenced or will commence at the earliest opportunity.

There are a number of situations where the Agency will not accept an enforcement undertaking for example, incidents or breaches which are serious (category 1 and 2) unless low culpability or negligence at a low level.  Where legal proceedings have commenced or where the offence was intentional then the Agency are unlikely to accept enforcement undertakings.  For this reason, where a company is considering offering an enforcement undertaking it should be made at a very early stage and it must not include clauses denying liability or restrictions on publicity.

Once an offer has been accepted, it becomes a legally binding written agreement between the offeror and the Environment Agency.  If the enforcement undertaking is not complied with then the Environment Agency can take enforcement action which can include prosecution for the original offence.

If you require environmental advice for your business, please contact one of the Ashbrooke team.